Skip to main content
All case studies
Built in 3 weeks · under Legal validation

Group S: social compliance priced in euros, not ticked off a list

Social Compliance Audit reviews the mandatory social documents a Belgian employer must hold, and prices the financial exposure carried by each gap. The questionnaire adapts to region, joint committee and headcount; the sanction amounts already include the ×10 surcharge multiplier of the reformed Social Criminal Code. V1 was built in 3 weeks and is now being validated by the Group S Legal teams.

Duration
3 weeks of build · Legal validation in progress
Sector
Compliance · Belgian social criminal law
Size
Group of 800 employees · Belgium
The client

Group S

Group S, one of Belgium's leading payroll and HR service providers. Its Legal division advises tens of thousands of employers on social law, including the documents an inspection can ask for at any moment.

The situation

How did it work before?

The document review was done by hand, file by file. The applicable rules change with the region, the joint committee (JC 200, JC 302 Horeca, JC 124) and the headcount, so no generic checklist held up. And a checklist says what is missing without ever saying what it costs.

The trigger

The reform of the Social Criminal Code, in force on 1 February 2026, multiplies sanction amounts by the ×10 surcharge. A gap that used to be a formality became a material financial exposure. It had to be calculated, not estimated.

What we did

Step by step.

  1. Week 1

    Framing the reference set with the lawyers

    Mapping the mandatory documents into sections, then the conditional logic: which document applies to which region, which joint committee, which headcount. Each sanction amount is attached to its legal source with the ×10 surcharge included. The reference set is versioned: an audit freezes the version it was run under, so a past audit stays readable after the law changes.

  2. Week 2

    Conditional audit engine and exposure calculation

    Company profile, then a questionnaire that only asks what actually applies. Exposure is computed as maximum amount × headcount, capped by the legal 100-worker ceiling of Art. 103 of the Social Criminal Code. The result is an amount in euros and a sanction level, not a score out of ten.

  3. Week 3

    Report, legal assistant and multi-tenant isolation

    Standard or Expert PDF report, with an AI-generated narrative on the Expert version, plus a contextual legal assistant that answers on the reference set rather than in general. Strict per-organisation isolation through row-level security, EU hosting, GDPR export and erasure, FR / NL / EN.

  4. In progress

    Legal validation and regulatory governance

    The Group S Legal teams are reviewing the reference set and the reports document by document. In parallel, a Group S cockpit gives them the analytics and the publishing procedure for a new regulatory version, so the tool no longer depends on us to follow the law.

The numbers

What is measurable.

  • 3 wksBuild of V1, from framing to testable product
  • ×10Surcharge multiplier included in every amount
  • 4Sanction levels priced in euros
  • FR·NL·ENThree languages, EU hosting
Step 1, Discover

Not (yet) ready to talk?

Try the AI Radar first : a free AI diagnostic in 10 minutes, with a prioritized roadmap as outcome.

What next?

What follows.

Once Legal validation is complete, the tool goes to the group's employers. The regulatory reference set is published as a version, so an audit run today stays readable in two years, under the law that applied on the day it was run.

A context close to yours?

Scope, timeline and price in writing within 5 business days, before any commitment.

Step 3, Decide

Describe your trade.
We'll show you the tool.

30 minutes to understand your need, then a scope, a timeline and a price in writing within 5 days. And a prototype before any commitment.

Book a meetingScope, timeline and price in writing within 5 working days
Or explore our other free tools:AI NavigatorAI Act Guardian